Home >> content-3 >> Maintaining Transparency in High-Aluminum Silicate Glass with 266 nm UV Laser Marking




Maintaining Transparency in High-Aluminum Silicate Glass with 266 nm UV Laser Marking

Introduction:
The use of deep ultraviolet (UV) lasers at 266 nm for marking high-aluminum silicate glass has become increasingly popular due to its precision and the ability to create high-quality marks. However, one of the challenges faced in this process is maintaining the transparency of the glass, which is crucial for applications where visibility is essential. This article will discuss the factors that affect transparency during the laser marking process and how to control them to ensure that the transparency of the marked area is reduced by less than 2%.

Laser Marking Process:
Laser marking machines using 266 nm UV lasers are known for their ability to etch materials at a microscopic level, creating permanent and high-contrast marks. The process involves directing a high-intensity laser beam onto the glass surface, which results in localized heating and material removal or alteration, depending on the material and the laser parameters used.

Factors Affecting Transparency:
1. Laser Power: The power of the laser is a critical factor that affects the transparency of the glass. Too much power can cause excessive heating, leading to microcracks and a decrease in transparency.

2. Pulse Width: The duration of the laser pulse can also impact the marking process. Shorter pulses can reduce heat-affected zones, thus minimizing the risk of transparency loss.

3. Repetition Rate: The frequency at which the laser fires can influence the overall heat buildup on the glass surface. A lower repetition rate allows for more time between pulses for the glass to cool down.

4. Focus and Beam Quality: The focus of the laser and the quality of the beam are essential for precise marking. A well-focused beam with high beam quality can create marks with minimal heat扩散, preserving transparency.

5. Scanning Speed: The speed at which the laser scans across the glass surface can also affect the transparency. A slower scanning speed allows for more precise control over the energy delivered to the glass.

Controlling Transparency Loss:
To keep the transparency loss to less than 2%, it is essential to optimize the laser parameters. Here are some strategies to achieve this:

1. Power Adjustment: Start with a lower laser power and gradually increase it until the desired mark is achieved without causing excessive heat or microcracks.

2. Pulse Width Optimization: Use shorter pulses to minimize the heat-affected zone and reduce the risk of transparency loss.

3. Repetition Rate Control: Adjust the repetition rate to allow for adequate cooling between pulses, preventing heat buildup on the glass surface.

4. Focus and Beam Quality: Ensure that the laser beam is well-focused and has high beam quality to create precise marks with minimal heat扩散.

5. Scanning Speed Regulation: Control the scanning speed to deliver the right amount of energy to the glass without causing overheating.

Conclusion:
By carefully controlling the laser parameters, it is possible to mark high-aluminum silicate glass with a 266 nm UV laser while maintaining transparency loss to less than 2%. This precision is crucial for applications where the glass's optical properties must be preserved. With the right settings and careful monitoring, laser marking machines can deliver high-quality, durable marks on glass without compromising its transparency.

.

.

Previous page: Achieving White Marking on Glass Surfaces with 1064 nm Fiber Laser: Avoiding Micro-Cracks      Next page: The Impact of Preheating on 1064 nm Fiber Laser Marking of Thin Glass



Minimizing Heat Affected Zone on Stainless Steel with Narrow Pulse Width Fiber Laser Marking Machines    

Engraving Diffractive Structures on Microlens Array Molds with a Green Laser Marking Machine    

Understanding the Power Modulation Speed of CO₂ Radio Frequency Tube Laser Marking Machines    

Achieving Biodegradable Timing Codes on PEEK Implants with Green Laser Marking Machines    

Minimizing Heat Impact on the Backside of Stainless Steel During Laser Marking    

Compensation for Pulse Tracking Delay in MOPA Laser Marking for High-Speed Aluminum Flight Marking    

Precision Marking on PEEK Cranial Plates with Green Cold Processing Laser Marking Machine    

CO₂ Laser Marking Machine: Winter Anti-Freezing Measures    

Determining Focus Position for Laser Marking on Glass with a Laser Marking Machine    

Fiber-Semiconductor Hybrid Pump Laser Marking Machine: Efficiency Analysis    




Related Article

Maintaining Transparency in High-Aluminum Silicate Glass with 266 nm UV Laser Marking    

The Impact of Preheating on 1064 nm Fiber Laser Marking of Thin Glass    

Optimizing Pulse Energy for 355 nm UV Laser Marking of Glass Microhole Arrays with Crack Lengths <20 µm    

Comparative Experimental Design for Heat Crack Suppression in CO2 Laser Marking of Glass Bottles: Air Cooling vs. Water Cooling    

Comparative Study on Heat Crack Suppression in Glass Bottle Marking with 10.6 µm CO₂ Laser: Air Cooling vs. Water Cooling Assistance    

Modeling Pulse Energy Deposition for Heat Stress Prediction in Femtosecond 1030 nm Laser Marking of Glass    

Controlling Taper Angle to Less Than 5° in Deep Engraving Glass with 10.6 µm CO₂ Laser Marking Machine    

Impact of Dynamic Focusing on Edge Resolution in 3D Curved Glass Marking with 355 nm UV Laser    

Minimizing Crosstalk in Dual-Layer QR Code Marking on Glass with 1064 nm Fiber Laser    

Establishing Depth-Energy Lookup Tables for Multi-Level Depth Grayscale Marking with 1030 nm Femtosecond Laser on Glass    

Optimizing the Fabrication Window for 532 nm Green Laser Marking of Glass Microlens Arrays with a 50 µm Radius of Curvature